Suspended Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo has ignited fresh controversy by reportedly rejecting a summons from the five-member committee tasked with investigating petitions for her removal, according to unconfirmed social media reports circulating on X and local radio discussions.
The refusal, discussed on Alaska Radio 92.3 FM on May 17, 2025, has intensified scrutiny of Torkornoo’s conduct amid allegations of judicial interference and financial impropriety, including a GH₵456,456 contract awarded to her daughter’s company, Design 37 Limited.
Profile of Justice Gertrude Torkornoo
The committee, chaired by Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, was established under Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution to probe three petitions following Torkornoo’s suspension by President John Mahama on April 22, 2025.
Sources on X, including a post by @MPKwarteng_, indicate the committee began public hearings on May 14, 2025, but Torkornoo’s alleged refusal to appear has raised questions about her cooperation. Radio host Alaska, during the 92.3 FM broadcast, cautioned against premature conclusions, stating, “I’ve seen it on social media, but it’s not confirmed. The procedures under Article 146 are clear—her lawyers will have their day to address the committee.”
Critics, including investigative journalist Kevin Taylor, argue Torkornoo’s defiance reflects a broader pattern of impunity, citing her office’s role in the controversial contract as evidence of corruption. Taylor, on Loud Silence TV, emphasized the need for robust prosecution, dismissing special prosecutor mechanisms as “noise-making.” He advocated for empowering regional Attorney General offices to pursue such cases, ensuring culprits repay misappropriated funds with interest.
However, Torkornoo’s supporters, as noted in a Modern Ghana report, highlight her April 23, 2025, denial of financial impropriety allegations, arguing the suspension is politically motivated. The Center for Citizenship, Constitutional and Electoral Systems (CENSUS) has filed a Supreme Court writ to halt the committee’s probe, claiming it violates Torkornoo’s rights under Article 17, though analysts like Alaska dismiss this as fishing for legal loopholes.
