Political commentator and outspoken NPP supporter P.K. Sarpong has raised sharp concerns about the circumstances surrounding the return of Vice President Professor Naana Jane Opoku-Agyemang to Ghana, following a period of medical treatment in London. In a public statement, Sarpong directed his message to the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, calling on him to lead an investigation into the Vice President’s use of a private jet for her return.
According to Sarpong, the Vice President arrived at Kotoka International Airport on a VistaJet, a luxury private aircraft service that reportedly charges thousands of dollars per hour. He questioned why such a costly option was chosen when the country owns a presidential jet that could have been deployed for her travel. Sarpong also expressed concern that the private flight’s charges may include the cost of returning the jet to Europe, further compounding potential expenses.-
While Sarpong expressed relief and gratitude for the Vice President’s recovery, he noted that the use of a private jet in a time of economic strain raises legitimate concerns about government expenditure and accountability. He pointed out that President Mahama is currently in the country, implying that the presidential jet should have been available for official use.
Sarpong challenged Minister Ablakwa to demonstrate the same level of scrutiny he displayed in opposition, when he actively monitored and exposed presidential and ministerial travel costs under the Akufo-Addo administration. He urged Ablakwa not to allow his role in government to diminish his commitment to transparency and fiscal responsibility, especially in matters involving the use of public funds for official travel.
He further appealed to Ablakwa to take the issue to Parliament by filing an urgent question to compel Defence Minister Dr. Edward Omane Boamah to provide a full explanation regarding the Vice President’s travel arrangements.
Sarpong concluded his statement by stating that the Ghanaian public deserves clarity on how state resources are being used, particularly in relation to high-profile officials. As of now, neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the Office of the Vice President has issued an official response. The issue continues to stir public debate on government accountability and expenditure.
